10
years after the publication of the Women’s Health Initiative trials data1,
certain facts and data have emerged that can help guide us in this so
controversial an issue of Menopausal Hormonal Therapy (MHT). The following is a
summary of a review published lately in the journal Menopause2.
It
has always been a truth that MHT is an acceptable option for treating severe
early menopausal symptoms. As is the wont of these symptoms, they disappear
within 10 years of menopause, thus this treatment is prudent and applicable within
this time frame. Such therapy must of course be precluded in the presence of medical
problems, foremost of which are blood clots, heart disease, stroke and cancer.
Estrogen
replacement alone suffices for a woman who has lost her uterus, whereas
progesterone therapy needs to be added for the sole purpose of prevention of
endometrial cancer in those who retain theirs. If the symptoms are limited to
the vulva, vagina and the bladder, topical estrogen therapy to the affected
parts might be enough to soothe the symptoms.
So
much is so true, and we must keep in mind that the whole controversy arose not
because of questionable beneficial effects, rather, the serious consequences of
MHT. Foremost in the mind of most women is the occurrence of breast cancer. The
WHI trials demonstrated an increased risk of breast cancer with more than 5
years continued use of the estrogen-progesterone combination therapy. This
increased risk was not present in users of estrogen-only preparations, thus
suggesting a causal link of breast cancer with progesterone. The data shows
that the risk is not that great and decreases after discontinuation of said replacement
therapy. Estrogen, whether given alone or together with progesterone, increases
the risk of thromboembolic events (TE) such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary
embolism and stroke, but these occurrences are rare before the age of 59 years.
Thus
we have come to accept that combination estrogen-progesterone MHT is proven
effective in the management of early menopausal symptoms only (and not for
other indications) but should be used for the shortest duration and with the
lowest possible dosage. More flexibility is accorded to estrogen only therapy
but similar caveats should apply whenever possible.
1. Risks and Benefits of Estrogen Plus Progestin in Healthy
Postmenopausal Women. Principal Results From the Women's Health Initiative
Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA 2002;288(3):321-333.
2. Stuenkel CA, Gass MLS, Manson J et al. A Decade After the
Women’s Health Initiative – The
Experts Do Agree. Menopause 2012;19(8):846-847.
No comments:
Post a Comment